Classic Vs State of West Bengal (Calcutta High Court) This writ petition has been filed for the relief by way of direction upon the respondents authority concerned to bear the additional tax liability for execution of subsisting Government contracts either awarded in the pre-GST regime or in the post GST regime without updating the Schedule […]
order has been passed without any giving opportunity to the petitioner to produce the relevant documents which were in his custody, is being set aside and the matter is being remanded back to the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh order after giving one opportunity to petitioner
If initiation of penalty is one limb & levy of penalty is on other limb, then in absence of proper SCN, there is no merit in levy of penalty
GST -Petitioner undertakes that it shall furnish bank guarantee of amount equal to penalty, so that authority can release vehicle.
Vineet Sethi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee has been terminated vide letter issued by TBM Consultants India Pvt. Ltd. dated 23.2.2016 due to misconduct of the assessee, wherein it was alleged that assessee has been indulging in activities, which are prejudicial to the interest of the employer company and assessee was promoting and carrying […]
All Odisha Tax Advocates Association Vs Union of India (Orissa High Court) HC held that Considering that the Department has itself acknowledge that there have been technical glitches which have prevented many Assesses from filing their returns and tax audit reports within time, and taking a cue from the aforementioned judgment of the Gujarat High […]
Arati Construction Vs Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal) (Orissa High Court) In the event the petitioner wants to avail the remedy by preferring appeal before the 2nd appellate tribunal then the petitioner is liable to pay 20% balance disputed tax for consideration of its appeal by the 2nd GST appellate tribunal GSTAT). Since the […]
The assessee however submitted that its operations were closed and being no regular employee looking after the matter, the notices issued by the Learned CIT(A) could not be complied.
ITAT held that as per specific provision of Section 28(v) of the Income Tax any interest, salary etc. earned by a partner from a partnership firm is taxable under the head profit and gains of business or profession and there is no question of categorizing it under the head income from other sources.
Final order passed by AO is beyond limitation period provided u/s 144C of Income Tax Act, hence, same is liable to be declared as null & void
