Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Featured

S. 194J Maintenance of hospital equipments is ‘professional service’

June 22, 2012 3469 Views 0 comment Print

The operation theatre and surgical are highly technical equipments for the operation of the persons. Therefore, they cannot be maintained in a routine or normal manner, but a technical person is required for maintenance of such equipments. Similar is the case with RO system, CT scan machine, MRI machine, lift and sterlisation and medical equipments. Therefore, these contracts cannot be the contracts in a routine or normal manner but for which technical service has been rendered and provisions of section 194J, read with Explanation 2 to section 9(1)(vii) are attracted.

Prepayment penalty charges & upfront fees are revenue expenditure

June 22, 2012 9109 Views 0 comment Print

There is no need to capitalize the upfront fee for term loan in connection with the transfer of the loans from one bank to another against prepayment penalty charges paid to the existing banks to migrate from a costly 15% p.a. loan to chaper 10% p.a. loan offered by another bank.

Gift – Addition justified if Assessee fails to prove financial capacity of Donor

June 22, 2012 2136 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee’s argument of having established his bona fides in view of the money being deposited in his regular bank account would also be to no avail. Does the assessee mean to imply that he has some other unaccounted bank accounts as well, in which the amount could have been deposited? To pay the tax, legitimately due, and to recover the same, is the bounded duty of the citizen and the State respectively. In view of the foregoing, the application of section 69A is confirmed in the instant case by the revenue and, accordingly, the assessee’s ground is dismissed.

No TDS deductible on interest for delayed payment of Purchase Bills U/s. 194A

June 22, 2012 16297 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal has held that a payment which has direct link and immediate nexus with the trading liability being connected with the delayed purchase payments will not fall within the category of interest as defined in section 2(28A). The payment made by the assessee in the present appeal being of similar nature also cannot be termed as interest as defined under section 2(28A).

Difference b/w Market & Offer Price of ESOP is deductible expenditure

June 22, 2012 1312 Views 0 comment Print

The issue raised vide present grounds of appeal is in relation to the equity shares to be issued to the employees as sweat equity. The assessee vide special resolution passed at the extraordinary general meeting held on 31.3.2006 had allotted 394692 number of equity shares @ Rs. 106.26 amounting to Rs.4.19 crores to its employees as sweat equity. List of the allottees was before the Board during the course of extraordinary general meeting and the finding of the CIT (Appeals) is that the said shares were allotted immediately thereafter.

Section 80-IB deduction cannot be denied on job work income

June 22, 2012 1813 Views 0 comment Print

There is no dispute to the fact that the eligible business of the assessee is manufacturing of biscuits and the assessee has received the conversion charges by carrying out the manufacturing process on behalf of ITC Ltd. The word ‘manufacture’ is of much wider connotation and would include any process as a result of which a different commodity having distinct name, use and character emerges from the raw material.

Implementation of Paradigm shift in Taxation of Services – New Notifications

June 21, 2012 2152 Views 0 comment Print

Yesterday, the TRU has issued number of Notifications to give effect of implementation of Paradigm shift in taxation of Services –Budget 2012 by way of either rescinding or amending old Notifications including some of recently issued Notifications during the time of Budget 2012 i.e. 17th March, 2012, which were supposed to come into force from the date on which the new Section 66B (the new charging Section) i.e. 1st July 2012.

Involvement in a scam cannot be ground for sustaining penalty imposed u/s. 271E

June 21, 2012 906 Views 0 comment Print

The expression ‘reasonable cause’ used in Section 273B is not defined under the Act. Unlike the expression ‘sufficient cause’ used in Section 249(3), 253(5) and 260A(2A) of the Act, the legislature has used the expression ‘reasonable cause’ in Section 273B of the Act. A cause which is reasonable may not be a sufficient cause. Thus, the expression ‘reasonable cause’ would have wider connotation than the expression ‘sufficient cause’. Therefore, the expression ‘reasonable cause’ in Section 273B for non-imposition of penalty under Section 271E would have to be construed liberally depending upon the facts of each case.

MVAT – Disallowance of Input Tax Credit if tax is not paid by selling dealer

June 21, 2012 21141 Views 5 comments Print

No Input Tax Credit claim shall be allowed unless the corresponding tax is paid by the selling dealer into the Government treasury. In the case of mismatch in the sales and purchases in electronic matching of annexure Jl and J2 of form 704, then to the extent of unmatched amount of tax, the ITC of the claimant dealer shall be denied.ITC claim shall not be allowed if the purchases are effected from hawala dealer and even though such hawala dealer has paid the taxes partially or fully as these are not genuine transactions.

Punjab Value Added Tax- Ready Reckoner

June 21, 2012 50853 Views 13 comments Print

This ready reckoner is prepared with the aim to present the changes in Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 at one place. Ready reckoner is divided in to different parts containing the general information, tax calendar, Procedure of Registration, Input tax Credit, Works Contract, Refund, Appeal, Assessment, Revision, Entry Tax, Interest, Penalties and other vital information like forms, fees, time limits under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031