Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : Courts have clarified that purchases cannot be disallowed without proper evidence. Genuine transactions supported by documents can...
Income Tax : ITAT held that section 69 cannot be invoked where purchases are duly recorded in books and paid through banking channels, making t...
Income Tax : Detailed overview of penalties under various sections of the Income Tax Act, covering defaults in tax payment, reporting, document...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT deleted a 69C unexplained expenditure addition for alleged bogus purchases, ruling that when corresponding sales are ac...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that disallowance of interest cannot be finalized when the validity of underlying loans is still under appeal. I...
Income Tax : The issue was whether purchases could be treated as bogus based on investigation reports. ITAT held that when documentary evidence...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus when supported by invoices, bank payments, and GST records. It ruled t...
Income Tax : The issue was whether income from hybrid seed production on leased land qualifies as agricultural income. The Tribunal held that o...
Income Tax : The issue was whether reassessment is valid without proper service of notice. The Tribunal held that absence of valid service make...
ITAT Delhi ruled that Section 115BBE’s higher tax rate applies only to transactions from April 1, 2017, aligning with a Madras High Court precedent.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition based on statement is liable to be quashed as the statement was recorded from the back of the assessee and the assessee was not given an opportunity to cross-examine the deponent. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad reviews Sankalp Recreation’s tax appeals concerning unaccounted income, expenses, book rejection, and PF/ESIC disallowances following a search operation.
ITAT Raipur sets aside reassessment order for Kachrulal Jitendra Kumar, ruling the Section 148 notice time-barred. Cites Supreme Court judgments in Ashish Agarwal and Rajeev Bansal on reassessment limitation.
ITAT Mumbai held that the addition in respect of bogus purchases is to be limited to the extent of bringing the gross profit rate on such purchases at the same rate as of other genuine purchases. Accordingly, matter restored to file of AO with direction to restrict addition.
ITAT Mumbai overturned an income addition for Leena Haresh Harde, ruling that unsecured loans were genuine, and an assessment based solely on uncorroborated third-party statements without cross-examination is invalid.
ITAT Delhi held that in case of bogus purchases only profit element embedded should be taxed and entire amount of purchases cannot be taxed. Accordingly, AO directed to apply profit rate of 5% on unverifiable purchases.
Delhi ITAT deletes ₹24 lakh unexplained expenditure addition on Hitesh Rohilla, citing lack of direct evidence linking alleged capitation fee payment to the assessee.
Ahmedabad ITAT remands Naimishbhai Kantibhai Patel’s reassessment case for a fresh opportunity, citing non-compliance and imposing a Rs. 5,000 cost.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses PCIT’s Section 263 order against Kisan Agro Mart, ruling a presumed 3% commission on accommodation entries was based on surmises, lacking evidence.
