Income Tax : Overview of Income Tax Sections 69A, 69B, on unexplained income, investments, and expenditures. Key cases and interpretations incl...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Corporate Law : Assessees face 78% tax and 6% penalty for unexplained investments or expenditures under Sections 69 to 69C of Income Tax Act if de...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Somnath Kelavni Mandal's income tax appeal due to continuous absence in proceedings. Case pertains to une...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai deletes additions under Section 69A for cash deposits made during demonetization by P. Tamilmani. Case highlights pro...
Income Tax : Additional income offered by assessee on account of cash and excess stock is liable to be taxed as business income and not unexpla...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai rules bad debt recovery as business income, deleting Rs. 1 crore addition under Section 69A. Read full details on the...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that loose sheets picked u/s 132, falls within definition of ‘document’ mentioned in section 132(4) and theref...
Kolkata ITAT upholds LTCG disallowance in Brajesh Narnolia Vs ITO, emphasizing that a company’s genuineness isn’t judged by the magnitude of profit.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minority Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. on interest income deduction under section 80P(2)(d) from unlicensed co-op bank investments for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Delhi deletes addition under section 69A of Income Tax Act in Viren Bakhru vs. ACIT case. Assessee’s explanation of cash deposit during demonetization accepted.
Kerala HC allows Lavia Infra Ltd. to submit missing documents due to MD’s illness, giving six weeks for compliance with Income Tax Act, 1961.
Kerala High Court rules that an income tax assessment order passed on an old PAN is appealable even if a new PAN is issued, provided the old PAN is active.
Explore the Jharkhand High Court’s decision in Pasari Casting vs. Income Tax Department, addressing a critical tax reassessment issue. A detailed analysis inside.
Explore the legal intricacies as ITAT Mumbai delves into the dispute over undisclosed income, cash receipts, and the application of Section 69A in the case of Madhu Developers
Read the full text of ITAT Mumbai’s order in Rohinton Homi Sanga Vs DCIT case. No income tax addition for an employee acting on behalf of company directors. Analysis and conclusion provided.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore ruling in Shaon Paul vs. ITO case. Addition under section 69A upheld due to imprudent retention of a sum for a long period. Details here.
Delhi High Court’s ruling in PCIT (Central) vs. Sanjay Singhal upholds ITAT’s deletion of addition under Section 69A for AY 2015-16, emphasizing need for incriminating material for valid additions.
