Income Tax : The article explains how violating the twin conditions under Section 50C(2) can block valuation relief and trigger taxation on hig...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that capital gains from land gifted to spouse are taxable in the husband’s hands under Section 64(1)(iv), no...
Income Tax : Learn how Section 50C impacts genuine property sales. Explore case laws, strategies, and defenses to handle unfair tax additions d...
Income Tax : Section 50C: For property sales, if the sale price is lower than the value assessed by Stamp Valuation Authority, that value is co...
Income Tax : Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society has made a Representation on 'Suggestions for Amendments in the Income Tax Act', on 24th May...
Income Tax : In relation to computing capital gains tax liability on transfer of land or building, amendment made via the Finance Act, 2016 giv...
Income Tax : Rationalisation Of Section 50c To Provide Relief Where Sale Consideration Fixed Under Agreement To Sell- Section 50C makes a spec...
Income Tax : The case examined whether minor valuation differences can trigger taxation under Section 56(2)(x). ITAT held that differences with...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that where registration is delayed, the stamp duty value on the agreement date must be considered. The ruling ap...
Income Tax : The dispute involved incorrect invocation of valuation provisions by the AO. The Tribunal ruled that using Section 142A instead of...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that capital gains were computed without considering the DVO valuation report. It held that ignoring such evide...
Income Tax : ITAT held that vacant unsold flats attract tax on notional rent under house property. The key takeaway is that ownership triggers ...
Income Tax : Notification No. 8/2020-Income-Tax- CBDT has notified Other electronic modes by inserting New Income TAx Rule 6ABBA. It also amend...
Delhi High Court dismisses Revenue’s appeal in Modipon Ltd. case, ruling against strict application of Section 50C when circle rates rise between agreement to sell and sale deed dates. Upholds ITAT decision.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal by the PCIT against Thomson Press (India) Ltd, upholding that Section 50C applies based on circle rates at the time of agreement to sell, not the later sale deed.
CIT(Appeals) failed to admit the additional evidences which went to the root of the matter for determining the issue of taxability of long term capital gains as was made by AO ignoring the submissions of assessee. Therefore, the case was remanded to AO for fresh assessment, with liberty to assessee to furnish evidence.
Madras High Court rules property transfer for capital gains is based on effective date, not registration date. Section 50C application is clarified where transfer conditions under Section 2(47)(v) are met in prior years.
Delhi ITAT partially allows Vijay Rai Marwaha’s appeal for AY 2020-21, deleting Section 50C addition and adjusting cost of acquisition in a capital gains assessment.
ITAT Hyderabad held that denial of exemption under section 54F on allegation of more than one residential house unwarranted as one residential house is gifted to his daughter. Accordingly, exemption allowed and appeal of revenue dismissed.
The Revenue alleges that the appellants/assessee got the said company CCL incorporated only for the purpose acquiring properties in UK by which he could avoid declaration of the ownership in the properties in India.
ITAT Delhi held that registered deed of new property not mandatory for claiming exemption under section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Investment in property and possession thereof sufficient for claiming exemption.
ITAT Mumbai held that since donations collected were parked in savings bank account of assessee and funds were used for personal purpose hence donation collected are taxable u/s. 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee dismissed.
ITAT Raipur held that reopening of proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond a period of 4 years without failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully & truly all the material facts is liable to be annulled.
