Income Tax : Tribunal held that an assessment is void when the competent officer does not issue the mandatory notice. Jurisdiction cannot arise...
Income Tax : Understand the three core processes of Indian Income Tax: Rectification of mistakes (Sec 154), the four types of Assessment (Summa...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held the assessment invalid as no mandatory notice under Section 143(2) was issued. The key takeaway is that absence ...
Income Tax : ITAT held that reassessment without issuing notice under Section 143(2) is invalid, even if return was filed late. The ruling emph...
Income Tax : Despite disputes over agricultural income additions, the Tribunal focused on the legality of the proceedings. It held that issuing...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that reassessment proceedings initiated against a dead person are void in law. A valid notice must be issued to...
Income Tax : While deleting the interest disallowance on merits, the Tribunal remanded the brought-forward loss issue for limited verification....
ITAT Ranchi held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on account of non-prosecution without deciding the matter on merits is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, matter remanded back for de novo adjudication.
ITAT Jaipur held that notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and order thereon issued in the name of Dead individual is null and void. Accordingly, the impugned notice and order held as void-ab-initio.
ITAT Mumbai invalidates income tax assessment for a merged entity, emphasizing the legal principle against actions on non-existent entities.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi’s order on the invalid notice issued before filing ITR, leading to the quashing of the assessment order in the case of Mideast Integrated Steels Ltd Vs ACIT.
Read the detailed analysis of Late Lodaya Navalbai Vs ITO case by ITAT Bangalore. Learn why the reassessment proceedings were quashed and its implications.
ITAT Ahmedabad ruled against C K Zipper Pvt Ltd, disallowing deduction under Section 35(1)(ii) of Income Tax Act for donations to ineligible research trust.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as source of fund duly explained. Rejection of the explanation relating to source of fund by the department without sufficient reason is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside re-assessment proceedings initiated after 4 years from the AY end, citing no new material for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Krishnaawtar Kabra L/H of Jagannath Rampal Kabra Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court addressed the issue of the validity of a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to a deceased assessee. The court ruled that the reopening of the assessment based on such […]
Learn about the validity of re-assessment without notice u/s 143(2) in the case of Gonuguntla Nirmala Devi vs. ACIT. Explore the full text of the ITAT Hyderabad order.
