Disallowance under Section 14A of Income TAx Act, 1961
Income Tax : Understanding the retrospective and prospective application of amendment in Section 14A of the Income-tax Act....
Income Tax : Section 14A, which pertaining to Expenditure incurred in relation to income not includible in total income, was introduced with ef...
Income Tax : Clarification in respect of disallowance under section 14A in absence of any exempt income during an assessment year Section 14A o...
Income Tax : The issue before the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC) was whether section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) enables the Depart...
Income Tax : In the landmark judgement the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India allowed the appeal of the South Indian Bank by settling the long dr...
Income Tax : Bombay Chartered Accountants' Society has made a Representation on 'Suggestions for Amendments in the Income Tax Act', on 24th May...
Income Tax : The mechanical disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D is also being added to the book profit by the AO irrespective of the fact whethe...
Income Tax : 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF IND-AS AND THEIR IMPACT ON TAXABLE INCOME IND-AS (Indian version of IFRS) accounting standards are being impl...
Income Tax : Amendments to Section 14A to provide that (i) dividend received after suffering dividend-distribution tax and share income from fi...
Income Tax : As earlier intimated to you, Writ Petition bearing No. 50 of 2010 (Indian Exporters Grievances Forum & Other vs. CIT) challenging ...
Income Tax : In the case of Krishnamurthy Thiagarajan vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai), AO's failure to record dissatisfaction u/s 14A led to ITAT allowin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Tata Steel Limited, allowing deduction of interest paid on Perpetual Non-Convertible Debentures (PNC...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashes assessment order in Welspun Global Brands Ltd Vs DCIT case. AO failed to follow Sec 144C(1) of Income Tax Act,...
Income Tax : Since the appellant hadn't filed the appeal through the Interim Resolution Professional as required under the resolution process, ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court ruling: Assessing Officer (AO) must record dissatisfaction with Assessee's claim regarding expenditure. Detailed...
Income Tax : 2) The expenditure in relation to income which does not form part of the total income shall be the aggregate of following amounts,...
Income Tax : Circular No. 5/2014-Income Tax Central Board of Direct Taxes, in exercise of its powers under section 119 of the Act hereby clari...
Income Tax : INCOME TAX NOTIFICATION NO-45/2008, DT: March 24, 2008 Method for determining amount of expenditure in relation to income not incl...
Income Tax : The provisions of Sections 144-A and 144-B of the Income-tax Act have come into force with effect from 1st January 1976. Instructi...
ITAT Mumbai grants relief to Central Bank of India, disallowing expenditure under Section 14A for securities held as stock-in-trade, citing the Maxopp Investment Ltd case.
ITAT Delhi held that forfeiture of share application money being forfeiture of a kind of deposits cannot be treated as revenue receipt. The same is capital in nature and hence not taxable.
In a significant ruling, ITAT Delhi states that no disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D can be made if no exempt income was earned in previous year.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order in the case of DCIT vs. Sarva Haryana Gramin Bank regarding penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi’s ruling on disallowing business expenses under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Analysis of Giri Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT case. Learn more.
ITAT Mumbai held that since the assessee has not earned any dividend income from its equity investment during the year disallowance of expenditure under section 14A of the Income Tax Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules is not sustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that fringe benefit tax is an allowable deduction in computing book profit as per Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that the date of dispatch from the adjudicating officer is relevant for determining the limitation period. Accordingly, assessment order dispatched beyond time limit prescribed u/s. 153(1) is barred by limitation.
ITAT Mumbai held that the amount of internal transfer between two EOUs of the assessee is to be considered for the purpose of arriving at the profit eligible for exemption under section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Kolkata held that interest payment on delayed deposit of income tax, whether TDS or otherwise is not an allowable expenditure.
