Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Bombay HC criticizes Pune Police for copying FIR from private complaint, highlighting legal implications and citizen harassment is...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC asserts that Section 498A IPC is often misused against entire families to exert pressure. Employment prospects should...
Corporate Law : The Orissa High Court ruled that voter ID alone is not reliable for determining age in insurance claims, directing LIC to reassess...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court recent judgment highlights the alarming misuse of the POCSO Act, where cases are filed due to family objections t...
Corporate Law : J&K&L High Court quashes money laundering case against Farooq Abdullah, citing absence of a scheduled offence under the Prevention...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC condones delay in GST appeal filing, restoring the case for a small businessman who missed the deadline due to GST por...
Income Tax : Calcutta HC directs reassessment after invalidating CGST assessment order due to lack of opportunity for hearing....
Income Tax : Calcutta HC directs PCIT to reconsider reassessment as notice was not received by the assessee. The case is remanded for fresh con...
Corporate Law : Patna High Court denies anticipatory bail to Manoj Singh in a gold smuggling case, citing lack of evidence and differences from a ...
Income Tax : Patna High Court decides that the JCIT cannot transfer a case under Section 127 without giving the assessee an opportunity to be h...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
V. Venkata Sivakumar Vs IBBI (Madras High Court) In this writ petition, the Petitioner challenges the constitutional validity of Regulation 7A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016 (the IP Regulations) read with Bye-Law 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) (Model Bye-Laws and Governing Board of […]
The petition is filed by retired official o quash charges in respect of offences of cheating, criminal conspiracy and Corruption against CIT(A).
The instant petition is filed to seek bail against the offences alleged against petitioner which are punishable under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(l) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Glonia Impex Vs Assistant Commissioner (SIIB) (Kerala High Court) The petitioner who is stated to be a supplier of diamonds, and a registered dealer under the Goods and Service Tax Act, within the jurisdiction of Mumbai, states that he had supplied diamonds to M/s. Nebal Tradings during the period 2017-18 and 2018-19 and the said […]
R.P. Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Allahabad High Court) In view of the submissions made at the bar and on perusal of the order dated 22.1.2020, it is clear that the rejection of the application is based upon the understanding that the GST TRAN-1 could not be filed on account of technical glitch […]
Blocking of importer exporter code of the petitioner by any authority other than the Director General of Foreign Trade or by his authorized officer under section 8 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 would be unauthorized, unwarranted and without jurisdiction.
Commissioner of Customs (II) Vs Poonam Courier Pvt. Limited (Bombay High Court) Remedy of appeal to the CESTAT is provided under section 129A of the Customs Act i.e., by the parent enactment. This right of appeal is a substantive right of an aggrieved person. It is not a matter of procedure but is a vested right […]
Vianaar Homes Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST (Delhi High Court) Conclusion: Authorities had power under Section 174(2)(e) of the CGST Act, 2017 to institute any investigation, inquiry, verification, assessment proceedings, adjudication, etc. under Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules. Held: Assessee-company was engaged in the business of construction of residential complexes since its […]
CIT Vs Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. (Madras High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the AO can go beyond the directions of CIT, even though during the course of fresh assessment proceedings, it is open to the AO to examine any items other than specific item ? High Court states that, the jurisdiction exercised […]
Urbanize Developers India Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court) 1. The petitioner, a private limited company which is registered with GST Authorities with the State of Karnataka, has filed this writ petition for a direction to the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, GSTLVO-60 [the respondent] to consider the petitioner’s representations […]
