Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Goods and Services Tax : February 2025 GST Case Law Compendium covers significant High Court and Supreme Court judgments on key GST issues. Orders issued u...
Corporate Law : Explore key landmark civil cases in India, including their legal impact on constitutional rights, reservations, governance, and wo...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court quashes order restricting a woman's liberty, stating participation in protests is not sufficient reason to curta...
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC orders 6% interest on delayed tax refunds under DTVSV Act, citing principles of natural justice. Refund delays due to a...
Income Tax : Guwahati High Court's landmark judgment on the tax rate for carbonated beverages containing fruit juice as per FSSAI Regulation 2....
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that sub-rule (4) of Rule 36 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules [CGST Rules] is constitutionally ...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court held that reopening of assessment based on borrowed satisfaction without there being any link between informati...
Income Tax : Deloitte Haskins And Sells Vs ACIT (Gujarat High Court) The High Court recently adjudicated a case concerning a writ petition file...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Allahabad High Court nullifies U.P. GST order against Viabhav Edible Pvt. Ltd., ruling no jurisdiction post-setting aside charges under Section 130.
Calcutta High Court orders Customs to compensate petitioner for seized goods value. Analysis of illegal confiscation case and court’s directive.
Karnataka High Court quashes criminal trespass case against father denied visitation rights. Analysis of the landmark judgment on paternal rights and legal recourse.
Calcutta High Court held that provisional attachment of bank account under section 83 of the CGST Act based on tangible materials found against the petitioners during investigation is legal, valid and within jurisdiction.
Explore the Madras High Court’s judgment on CIT vs Tamilnadu Cooperative Housing Federation Ltd. Get insights into key tax implications and deductions under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
Bombay High Court rules in favor of taxpayers, affirming the right to interest on excess Equalization Levy refunds. Detailed analysis and implications.
The impugned notices and orders were issued by the respondents/revenue admittedly subsequent to the public announcement under Section 15 of the Code regarding CIRP process pertaining to assessee and it was only subsequent to approval of the Resolution Plan of the Tribunal that Revenue issued the impugned Assessment Order and Demand Notice.
Read the Kerala High Court judgment on Covenant Stones vs CIT, where the writ petition challenging the conditional stay on tax demand is dismissed. Analysis of undisclosed income assessment provided.
The order passed by CESTAT was without jurisdiction, the Revenue, thus, was right in observing that the refund order sanctioned in favour of the Firm pursuant to the order of CESTAT, was required to be reviewed.
Read about Punnorath Meethal Sankaran vs ITO case: Kerala HC sets aside order rejecting condonation of delay in filing income return. Jurisdiction issue in refund claims above 10 Lakhs.
