Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Akhilesh Kumar Sah

Latest Articles


Avoid Heavy Penalty: Ensure Timely Filing of Tax Return

Income Tax : Where a person required to furnish a return of income under Section 139, fails to do so within the time prescribed in sub-section ...

August 29, 2020 15744 Views 4 comments Print

Difference between terms Business & Profession for income tax purposes

Income Tax : The Section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, contains an inclusive definition of the term business. There are differences betwe...

June 30, 2020 110978 Views 13 comments Print

Whether writing of bad debts in accounts sufficient to claim deduction U/s. 36(1)(Vii)?

Income Tax : The Delhi High Court, has held in CIT vs. Samara India(P) Ltd. (2013) 216 Taxman 93 , following the decision of Supreme Court in T...

June 28, 2020 59621 Views 1 comment Print

Question of Deductibility of an Expenditure U/s. 57(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : The provisions of the Income-tax Act relating to allowances disclose that the expenditure or outgoing sought to be deducted should...

June 10, 2020 132410 Views 7 comments Print

Distinction between Capital & Revenue Receipt

Income Tax : In CIT vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd. [2014] 221 TAXMAN 323, the Delhi High Court has observed (at page 341), that if the money paid rela...

June 10, 2020 61311 Views 3 comments Print


Latest Judiciary


A New Light on Reassessment Under Income Tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : In our view this is not a fair or proper procedure. If not in the first notice, at least at the time of furnishing the reasons the...

April 16, 2020 2130 Views 0 comment Print

L&T Case: Classic example of change of opinion

Income Tax : The assessee had challenged reopening of assessment on two grounds. The CIT(A) had accepted the arguments of the assessee, in ligh...

September 9, 2019 4539 Views 0 comment Print

Allowance of depreciation on the basis of consistency: BSE Ltd. case

Income Tax : We noted that in the very first year i.e. AY 2011-12, the depreciation has already allowed the claim of depreciation. We noted tha...

September 3, 2019 876 Views 0 comment Print

Liability for provisions can be measured only by using a substantial degree of estimation

Income Tax : The estimate of warranty made by the assessee on the basis of past history cannot be treated as a provision for any ascertained li...

July 1, 2019 3285 Views 0 comment Print

Initiation of penalty not valid if AO fails to record satisfaction for the same

Income Tax : Where no satisfaction had been recorded by the AO for initiation of penalty in the assessment order the same cannot invite the ass...

June 13, 2019 5241 Views 0 comment Print


When company not started its core activity, it cannot be construed that it had commenced its business

December 29, 2017 2955 Views 0 comment Print

Hyderabad Metro Rail Ltd.: when company not started its core activity, it cannot be construed that it had commenced its business and the income shown in the P&L A/c is not generated from the business activity of the assessee, rules ITAT, Hyderabad.

Revision petition U/s. 264 cannot be refused for pendency of similar petition for another year

November 28, 2017 1641 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner cannot refuse to entertain a revision petition filed by the assessee under Section 264 of the Act if it is maintainable on the ground that a similar issue has arisen for consideration in another year and is pending adjudication in appeal or another forum.

Accrual basis accounting: Income of relevant F.Y. is to be accounted in same F.Y.

November 26, 2017 2490 Views 0 comment Print

Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah ACIT vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. (Delhi ITAT) Mercantile based accounting requires income and expenditure of a financial year has to be taken in account in the same, concerned financial year. In ACIT vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. & vice versa [ITA Nos. 5246, 5247, 5248, 5249 and 5286/Del/2012, […]

Section 263: Failure to issue notice on any particular issue

November 22, 2017 4449 Views 0 comment Print

Failure to issue notice on any particular issue does not vitiate the exercise of power under Section 263 as long as the assessee is heard and given opportunity

Subsidy received for setting up of or expansion of industry: Whether ‘Capital receipt’ or a ‘Revenue Receipt’

November 18, 2017 14613 Views 0 comment Print

Even if a subsidy is given to attract industrial investment or expansion, which is a otherwise a capital receipt under the pre- amendment era, shall be treated as income chargeable to tax, except where it has been taken into account for determining the actual cost of assets in terms of Explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the Act.

Share premium cannot be treated as capital employed for Section 35D: SC

November 12, 2017 1602 Views 0 comment Print

The appellant contended therein that it had issued shares on a premium which, according to them, was a part of the capital employed in their business. The appellant, therefore, contended that it was on this basis it claimed the said deduction and was, therefore, entitled to claim the same under Section 35D of the Act.

Amendment U/s. 254(2): Six month time limit for rectification is Prospective

November 3, 2017 4773 Views 0 comment Print

The Amendment Under Section 254(2) In Respect Of Time Limit Of Six Months For Rectification Is Prospective And Applicable To The Orders Passed After 01.06.2016

Applicability of DTAA cannot be determined suo-moto by AO

November 2, 2017 1056 Views 0 comment Print

M/s. Google India Private Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT (ITAT Bangalore); TDS on royalty payments under section 195(2): Applicability of DTAA cannot be determined suo-moto by AO without there being any application

Exemption U/s. 10A / 10B can be claimed on incidental income from export of goods

October 30, 2017 3798 Views 0 comment Print

Profits of the business of the Undertaking for the purposes of Section 10-A/ 10-B includes the Profits and Gains from export of the articles as well as all other incidental incomes

Review of extension of date for filing audit reports & ITRs is a must

October 29, 2017 12714 Views 28 comments Print

It is estimated that a large number of cases are pending, countrywide, for audit as well as filing of related Income Tax Return(ITR), where there is compulsory requirement of audit & filing of ITR upto 31st of October 2017. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has done a great job by already extending the due date of 30.09.2017 to 31.10.2017 for filing of audit reports and returns well understanding in advance the hard realities in the matter.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031