Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : A S Housing Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
A S Housing Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss Appeal for Non-Prosecution: ITAT Raipur Restores Section 68 Addition on Partners’ Capital for Fresh Adjudication The Raipur Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee-firm’s appeal for AY 2018-19 for statistical purposes, holding that the CIT(A) acted contrary to law in dismissing the appeal ex-parte for non-prosecution, without adjudicating the issues on merits, in violation of section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act. The assessee, a builder-developer partnership firm, faced an addition of ₹3.39 crore under section 68 read with se...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930