This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Settlement Applications not disposed for reasons not attributable to the applicant cannot be treated as having abated
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Star Television Vs UOI (Bombay High Court)
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
S. 254 D (4A) was amended by the Finance Act 2007 to provide that if in respect of an application filed before 1.6.2007, the Settlement Commission did not pass a final order before 31.3.2008, the proceedings would abate. S. 245 HA (3) provided that the consequence of such abatement was that the income-tax authorities could, in making the assessment, use all the confidential material furnished by the assessee before the Settlement Commission. The said provisions were challenged as being ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution. HELD, upholding the challenge:
(i) Though Article 14 does not pro...
