Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad)

No Section 68 Addition When Capital Introduction Pertains to Another Year:

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2017-18, upholding the deletion of ₹2.27 crore addition under section 68 made on account of alleged unexplained capital introduction.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ex-Parte Appeal Dismissal Set Aside for Lack of Reasoned Order Reassessment Quashed as JAO Lacked Jurisdiction After Faceless Scheme Appeal Dismissed on Delay Remanded for Merits Despite Non-Compliance Accepted Closing Cash Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Income Appointment Denial Quashed for Ignoring Reasonable Accommodation View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031