Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Ashok Ramulbhaya Malhotra (ITAT Ahmedabad) No Section 68 Addition When Capital Introduction Pertains to Another Year: The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2017-18, upholding the deletion of ₹2.27 crore addition under section 68 made on account of alleged unexplained capital introduction. The Assessing Officer had treated deposits of ₹2,27,18,959 made with M/s Honeyvick Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and credited to the assessee’s capital account as unexplained cash credits, on the ground that no supporting evidence was fur...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930