Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : C.R. Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
C.R. Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Dividend Income Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Delhi Deletes Section 68 / 115BBE Addition The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and deleted the addition of ₹40.53 lakh made under section 68 read with section 115BBE, holding that exempt dividend income cannot be recharacterised as unexplained cash credit in the absence of any incriminating nexus. The Tribunal noted that both the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) had treated the assessee’s dividend income—duly disclosed and claimed as exempt—as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930