Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : C.R. Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
C.R. Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Dividend Income Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit: ITAT Delhi Deletes Section 68 / 115BBE Addition The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and deleted the addition of ₹40.53 lakh made under section 68 read with section 115BBE, holding that exempt dividend income cannot be recharacterised as unexplained cash credit in the absence of any incriminating nexus. The Tribunal noted that both the Assessing Officer and the CIT(A) had treated the assessee’s dividend income—duly disclosed and claimed as exempt—as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930