Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bank of Maharashtra Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bank of Maharashtra Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) Conclusion: PCIT was not justified in assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 in the case of Bank of Maharashtra allowing deduction under Section 36(1)(via) as Assessing Officer’s (AO) assessment order was not erroneous, even if it was prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Held: Assessee -public sector bank had filed its income tax return for AY 2018-19, declaring a total loss of ₹1,612.29 crores under standard provisions. The return was processed under Section 143(1), and later, after scrutiny selection, a full assessment under Section 143(3) read with Sec...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031