Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Urmila Jagdish Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmila Jagdish Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Allotment Date Decides Holding Period: ITAT Mumbai Treats Redeveloped Flat Gains as LTCG, Allows Sec 54 Relief The Mumbai ITAT “F” Bench, comprising Smt. Beena Pillai (JM) & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (AM), allowed the appeal of Mrs. Urmila Jagdish Mehta for AY 2014-15 and held that capital gains arising from sale of a redeveloped residential flat were long-term capital gains, not short-term, thereby deleting the addition of ₹2.11 crore made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A). The Assessee originally acquired a flat in 1988. Pursuant...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case CA Not Liable for Client’s Bogus Entries: ICAI Clears Accountant with No Certification Role Suspicion ≠ Proof: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Multi-Bank Loan Fraud Case Delayed Retraction Backfires: ICAI Finds CA Guilty in Bogus Donation Tax Evasion Scheme Admission Seals Fate: ICAI Reprimands CA in Bogus Political Donation Scam View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930