Case Law Details
Case Name : Urmila Jagdish Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Urmila Jagdish Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Allotment Date Decides Holding Period: ITAT Mumbai Treats Redeveloped Flat Gains as LTCG, Allows Sec 54 Relief
The Mumbai ITAT “F” Bench, comprising Smt. Beena Pillai (JM) & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar (AM), allowed the appeal of Mrs. Urmila Jagdish Mehta for AY 2014-15 and held that capital gains arising from sale of a redeveloped residential flat were long-term capital gains, not short-term, thereby deleting the addition of ₹2.11 crore made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A).
The Assessee originally acquired a flat in 1988. Pursuant...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


