Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JD Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
JD Jewellers Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Reassessment Quashed – Approval Taken From Wrong Authority u/s 151; Beyond 3 Years Requires PCCIT Sanction The Assessee challenged reopening u/s 147 r.w.s.144B on the jurisdictional ground that sanction u/s 151 was wrongly obtained from PCIT instead of PCCIT. The record (page 2 of order) shows that reassessment for AY 2017-18 was initiated on 21.07.2022, clearly beyond 3 years from the end of the relevant AY. As per the amended section 151, where reopening is beyond 3 years, the specified sanctioning authority is PCCIT. However, AO obtained sanction only from...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031