Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Suchita Goyal Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Suchita Goyal Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) Mere Change of Opinion Not Enough: Delhi ITAT Quashes s.263 Revision on Interest Deduction u/s 24(b) Delhi ITAT set aside the revisionary order passed u/s 263, holding that the assessment order allowing deduction of interest on borrowed capital u/s 24(b) was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The PCIT had invoked s.263 on the ground that the AO wrongly allowed interest deduction of ₹96.01 lakh on borrowed capital for house property, alleging absence of an interest certificate from the lender and lack of nexus between the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930