Case Law Details
Case Name : Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
We note that, while culminating the reassessment proceeding in the case of the assessee, the Ld. AO vide concluding para placed at page 4 of his order communicated the assessee his action of initiating the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of Act for ‘under reporting / mis-reporting’ of income however by the impugned order has ended up levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for ‘furnishing inaccurate particulars of income’, which found perfunctory sustained by the Ld. CIT(A).
Undisputedly in the present case before us, the Ld. AO in the course of reassess...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
one party has been imposed penalty U/S 271(1)(c) as well as 271F after completion of face to face assessment for the AY 2015-16 and got assessment order in favor on 11-10-2022. Further he received show cause notice on 25-02-2023 for penalty US 271(a)(c) and 271F. Party has sent reply properly in faceless manner within due date. Again he received penalty order, computation sheets and Demand notice u/s as above to pay both.please advise if any remedies on it.