Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dinmahmad Hajibhai Momin Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dinmahmad Hajibhai Momin Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Additional 54B Claim Supported by Evidence Must Be Examined—CIT(A) Wrongly Rejected as ‘Not in Return’; Matter Restored to AO The Assessee did not originally file a return and was issued notice u/s 148 on 08.04.2022 on the basis of information showing property transactions aggregating ₹29.86 crore. In response, he filed a return declaring ₹2,90,63,110, comprising mainly LTCG on sale of agricultural land and claiming ₹1,66,79,520 u/s 54B for purchase of agricultural land at Shela. During reassessment, the Assessee furnished complete d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930