Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Exquisite Jewellery Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Exquisite Jewellery Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In a ruling that offers relief to taxpayers affected by retrospective amendments to tax laws, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai Bench has held that interest under Section 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, cannot be charged for a shortfall in advance tax payments if the shortfall arises due to an amendment introduced retrospectively. The appeal, filed by Exquisite Jewellery vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai), pertains to the assessment year 2008-09. The core of the dispute revolved around the levy of interest amounting to Rs. 20,15,970/- under Section 2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930