This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Interest Under Section 234B for Retrospective Tax Amendments
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Exquisite Jewellery Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Exquisite Jewellery Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
In a ruling that offers relief to taxpayers affected by retrospective amendments to tax laws, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai Bench has held that interest under Section 234B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, cannot be charged for a shortfall in advance tax payments if the shortfall arises due to an amendment introduced retrospectively.
The appeal, filed by Exquisite Jewellery vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai), pertains to the assessment year 2008-09. The core of the dispute revolved around the levy of interest amounting to Rs. 20,15,970/- under Section 2...
