Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ankur Mittal (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Ankur Mittal (ITAT Delhi)

AO can’t travel beyond 263 directions: ITAT Delhi upholds deletion of ₹12.12 cr u/s 69C; sustains ₹1.16 lakh u/s 69A

Delhi Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue’s appeal and the assessee’s cross-objection. The Tribunal held that while giving effect to a revision u/s 263, the AO must strictly confine himself to the specific directions issued by the PCIT. In the present case, the PCIT had only directed examination of the applicability of se

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

PCIT-263 Upheld for Inadequate Inquiry in Search Assessment: ITAT Mumbai Section 69C Not Invokable: ITAT Mumbai Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Bogus 80GGC Case Section 54 Deduction Allowed Even If Original Return Was Not Filed: ITAT Mumbai No Section 271AAA Penalty Where Search Disclosure Was Proper: ITAT Kolkata Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai Restricts Addition to 5% Where Sales Are Undisputed View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031