Case Law Details
Case Name : Ashish Gandhi Builders & Developers P. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Others (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
It is settled position in law that statement of fact recorded in the order of the Court/Tribunal has to be accepted as correct and conclusive. It cannot be contradicted by affidavit or otherwise as held by the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra vs. Ramdas S. Nayak 1982 (2) SCC 463, Central Bank of India vs. Vrajlal K. Gandhi 2003(6) SCC 573 and Jagvir Singh & Others vs. State (Delhi Admn.) 2007 (5) SCC 359.
Extract of the Case Law
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India of India challenges the order dated 28th September, 2016 passed by ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
One Comment
Cancel reply
True. Any one questioning a verdict must come before the tribunal in a reasonable time say about 60 or 90 days of the verdict, else the curative application called misc petition is not tenable; besides 2007 Apex ct judgement in Jasbir singh is indeed a guide; besides, statement of facts filed before ITAT always shd be treated final, is indeed correct proposition of law is my view too sir. tks