Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vikramkumar Kishanlal Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vikramkumar Kishanlal Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Section 68 Addition on Alleged Accommodation Sales; Entire Turnover Cannot Be Taxed When Purchases Are Undisputed The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19, deleting a major addition of ₹4.34 crore made under section 68 read with section 115BBE on account of alleged accommodation entries with Chaniyara Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. On the issue of reopening, the Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment under sections 147/148, holding that the Assessing Officer had applied h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930