Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vikramkumar Kishanlal Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vikramkumar Kishanlal Mehta Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Section 68 Addition on Alleged Accommodation Sales; Entire Turnover Cannot Be Taxed When Purchases Are Undisputed The Ahmedabad Bench of the ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19, deleting a major addition of ₹4.34 crore made under section 68 read with section 115BBE on account of alleged accommodation entries with Chaniyara Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. On the issue of reopening, the Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment under sections 147/148, holding that the Assessing Officer had applied h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930