Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pushpa Saluja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pushpa Saluja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Bogus Purchases Not Taxable u/s 68 – Only 10% Profit Element Sustained on Estimation Basis The Delhi ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal and substantially reduced the addition of ₹55.54 lakh made on account of alleged bogus purchases/sundry creditors for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal held that the additions could not be made under Section 68, as the disputed amounts represented purchases recorded in the trading account and not unexplained cash credits. Following the directions of the Delhi High Court in the assessee’s own case, the Tribunal ruled that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930