Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pushpa Saluja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pushpa Saluja Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Bogus Purchases Not Taxable u/s 68 – Only 10% Profit Element Sustained on Estimation Basis The Delhi ITAT partly allowed the assessee’s appeal and substantially reduced the addition of ₹55.54 lakh made on account of alleged bogus purchases/sundry creditors for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal held that the additions could not be made under Section 68, as the disputed amounts represented purchases recorded in the trading account and not unexplained cash credits. Following the directions of the Delhi High Court in the assessee’s own case, the Tribunal ruled that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930