Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rohit Seth Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rohit Seth Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Kolkata ITAT: “Computer-Aided Scrutiny” Alone Not Enough – Notice Must Specify Scope; ITAT Kolkata Quashes Assessment: Non-Specific Scrutiny Notice Under 143(2) Held Invalid; Assessment Collapses as 143(2) Notice Fails to Mention Scrutiny Type In this appeal before the ITAT Kolkata, the Assessee challenged the validity of assessment proceedings on the ground that the notice issued u/s 143(2) dated 24.09.2018 was defective. Assessee contended that as per CBDT Instruction No. F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017, notices u/s 143(2) must be issued ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930