Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rishi Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rishi Anand Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Assessment Quashed for Non-issuance of 143(2) Notice on Return Filed u/s 148 ITAT Kolkata Background Assessee did not file return of income u/s 139(1). Later, a notice u/s 148 was issued on 26.03.2022 after passing order u/s 148A(d), stating that income had escaped assessment. In response, Assessee filed a return on 13.03.2023, declaring income of ₹19.17 lakh. AO, however, treated this return as non-est since it was filed beyond the prescribed time limit. Despite this, AO proceeded to assess the income at ₹97.08 lakh, taking the returned income figure as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930