Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Maliyana Cooperative Cane Development Union (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Maliyana Cooperative Cane Development Union (ITAT Delhi) Commission from Sugar Factory Eligible for Deduction – ITAT Upholds 80P(2)(a)(iii) Relief to Cooperative Society Revenue appealed against CIT(A)’s order allowing deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) on commission income earned by the Assessee-society from marketing sugarcane grown by its members. AO had denied the deduction treating ₹3.62 crore commission as “income from other sources”, relying on Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO (2010) 188 Taxman 282 (SC). CIT(A) held that Totgars dealt with interest on surplus dep...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930