Bogus share capital: If document shows genuineness of transaction it cannot be treated as bogus for non appearance of shareholder

1] The Revenue has filed the appeal on following questions;

“6.3 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, orders of the Tribunal was perverse in deleting the addition of Rs.95,00,000/­ made u/s. 68 of the Act, relying only on the documentary evidence produced by the Respondent Company while ignoring the key factor that these entities were not traceable at their given addresses.

6.4 Whether on the facts and in the cir

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.