Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thar Stone Expo India Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Thar Stone Expo India Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Addition U/s 68 Deleted — Advance Given Repaid through Banking Channel Cannot Be Treated as Cash Credit: ITAT Kolkata The assessee challenged addition of ₹90 lakh made u/s 68 in reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s.144. AO treated advances as unexplained cash credit, which was upheld by CIT(A) mainly on ground of lack of evidences and Rule 46A issues. ITAT, however, allowed the appeal and deleted entire addition. 1770289987-dk2Q6B-1-TO Tribunal noted that the assessee had advanced ₹50 lakh each to Navrang Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. and Jatad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930