Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Thar Stone Expo India Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Thar Stone Expo India Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) Addition U/s 68 Deleted — Advance Given Repaid through Banking Channel Cannot Be Treated as Cash Credit: ITAT Kolkata The assessee challenged addition of ₹90 lakh made u/s 68 in reassessment proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s.144. AO treated advances as unexplained cash credit, which was upheld by CIT(A) mainly on ground of lack of evidences and Rule 46A issues. ITAT, however, allowed the appeal and deleted entire addition. 1770289987-dk2Q6B-1-TO Tribunal noted that the assessee had advanced ₹50 lakh each to Navrang Vinimay Pvt. Ltd. and Jatad...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930