Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Swapna Vs DCIT (Telangana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Swapna Vs DCIT (Telangana High Court) Addition under Section 69 Cannot Be Based on Unsigned, Unacted Agreement The Telangana High Court allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted the addition of ₹20 lakhs made under Section 69, holding that the same was unsustainable in law. The addition was based solely on a photocopy of an unsigned agreement for sale found during search proceedings, which was admittedly never acted upon and did not culminate in a completed transaction. The Court held that: An unsigned and unexecuted agreement, even if found during a search, does not constitute concl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Central Circle Not Exempt from Faceless Reassessment Regime: ITAT Hyderabad Appeal Dismissal for Non-Prosecution Invalid When Notices Sent to Wrong Email Address Telangana HC Quashes Section 148 Unsigned Reassessment Notice ITAT Hyderabad Dropped Penalties When Compliance Made Before Assessment Ends ₹3.49 Cr Cash Seizure Backed by Cash Book & Debtor Realisations: ITAT Deletes Sec 69A Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930