Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Naresh Kumar Morya Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Naresh Kumar Morya Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Delhi Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of Naresh Kumar Morya for AY 2017-18 and deleted the addition of ₹3.33 lakh made under section 56(2)(vii)(b) on account of alleged undervaluation of immovable property. The assessee had purchased a residential flat for a consideration of ₹49 lakh, whereas the stamp duty value was ₹52.33 lakh. The Assessing Officer treated the differential amount as income from other sources and made an addition, which was confirmed by the NFAC/CIT(A). The Tribunal held that the difference between the actual consideratio...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930