Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krutik Ashokkumar Parikh-HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krutik Ashokkumar Parikh-HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Conclusion: Addition of ₹21,72,300/- made by AO under section 68 was justified as sale of Karma ISP penny stock shares was a sham transaction and non-genuine which was being used in tax evasion practices to convert unaccounted income into exempt income. Held: Assessee, had originally declared an income of Rs. 1,90,780/-. AO reopened the assessment under section 147 after receiving information that the HUF had traded in a penny stock, Karma ISP. Assessee did not submit a revised return in response to the notice. During reassessment, AO note...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930