Case Law Details
Sri Nayaz Ahmed Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court)
State counsel to accept notice for respondents.
2. In the instant petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Order, dated 4-2-2019 vide Annexure-C, passed under section 83(1) read with section 5(3) of Karnataka Goods and Services Act of 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
3. Petitioner has a remedy of an appeal as provided under section 107 of the Act, which has not been exhausted. On the other hand, in the writ petition the petitioner has stated as follows :–
“It is submitted that, the petitioner has no other efficacious and alternate remedy except to file the present writ petition and he has not filed any other writ petition on the same cause of action in any other court of law.”
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
