Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Precision Automation and Robotics India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Page ContentsPrecision Automation and Robotics India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra)Supply & installation of car parking system is a permanent fixture attached to building/land wherein it is erectedEntire car parking system cannot be moved ‘as it is’ and necessarily has to be dismantledCar parking system cannot be functional unless it becomes permanent fixture to land/buildingActivities comparable to installation of car parking systems have been consistently held to be as immovable by various courts Precision Automation and Robotics India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Issue- Whet...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. T. CHANDRAMOULY says:

    In all the decisions of the AAR pertaining to Works Contract, one point which is very much relevant is not analysed i.e., the definition of goods under the CGST Act visa-vis the definition as provided in the central excise Act. The definitions are entirely different. Goods under cgst act is defined to mean every kind of movable property other than money and securities, but includes actionable claims, growing crops, gross and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before supply or under contract of supply. Under central excise act excisable goods are defined as the goods specified in the central excise tariff act. From the definition of goods provided in the CGST Act it is clear that things attached to the ground which are agreed to be severed before supply or under contract of supply are also goods. If the car parking systems are capable of being dismantled and erected some where else then they fit into the definition of goods. Similar is the case with solar power generating systems. In view of this the various decisions on the immovable property relied upon by AAR may not be relevant to issue on hand.

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to T. CHANDRAMOULY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930