Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In Re Bridgestone India Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In Re Bridgestone India Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra)

The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. is liable to pay GST on the nominal amounts recovered from its employees for subsidized canteen services. However, the AAR held that the provision of free non-air-conditioned bus transportation to employees does not constitute a “supply of service” under GST. In both cases, the AAR denied the input tax credit (ITC) to Bridgestone on the GST charged by the respective third-party service providers.

Bridgestone India, a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930