CA Gagandeep Singh Kochar
India is all set to introduce a tax reform—the goods and services tax (GST). Apart from creating a unified market across India, GST will help make India’s manufacturing competitive by cutting high logistics and warehousing costs.
A supply chain is the network of all the individuals, organizations, resources, activities and technology involved in the creation and sale of a product, from the delivery of source materials from the supplier to the manufacturer, through to its eventual delivery to the end user. The supply chain segment involved with getting the finished product from the manufacturer to the consumer is known as the distribution channel.
Supply chain management (SCM) is the oversight of materials, information, and finances as they move in a process from supplier to manufacturer to wholesaler to retailer to consumer. The three main flows of the supply chain are:
- Product flow,
- Information flow and;
- Finances flow.
How it works/Example:
A company’s production operation contains material input components, each of which incurs a cost which is recovered in the price of the finished product. Much of market competition is based on keeping the prices of finished products as low as possible without sacrificing quality. For this reason, supply chain management (SCM) attempts to bridge this gap effectively by closely monitoring the cost a company pays for materials and from whom the materials are being procured. In addition, SCM monitors the operational procedures from start to finish in order to identify costly and unnecessary procedural steps.
Current State:
Let’s look at two scenarios that shows how a Consumer goods (CG) manufacturer sells it goods to a distributor and how that impacts the location of the warehouse in a non GST environment. The “input tax credit “at the source the logistics cost in landed cost component have been ignored for simplicity.
Scenario A: Stock Transfer Sale
Supply Chain Point |
Landed Cost (in Rs.) |
Margin (in Rs.) |
Input VAT Credit (in Rs.) |
Price Before Tax (in Rs.) |
VAT |
CST |
Total Tax (CST+VAT) |
Final Price (in Rs.) |
Firm |
1000 |
500 |
0 |
1500 |
0% |
0% |
0 |
1500 |
Warehouse |
1500 |
0 |
0 |
1500 |
4% |
0% |
60 |
1560 |
Distributor |
1560 |
500 |
60 |
2000 |
4% |
0% |
80 |
2080 |
Retailer |
2080 |
1000 |
80 |
3000 |
4% |
0% |
120 |
3120 |
Scenario B: CST Sales to Distributors
Supply Chain Point |
Landed Cost (in Rs.) |
Margin (in Rs.) |
Input VAT Credit (in Rs.) |
Price Before Tax (in Rs.) |
VAT |
CST |
Total Tax (CST+VAT) |
Final Price (in Rs.) |
Firm |
1000 |
500 |
0 |
1500 |
0% |
2% |
30 |
1530 |
Warehouse |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
0 |
0 |
Distributor |
1530 |
500 |
0 |
2030 |
4% |
0% |
81.2 |
2111.2 |
Retailer |
2111.2 |
1000 |
81.2 |
3030 |
4% |
0% |
121.2 |
3151.2 |
In scenario two the final price (Rs. 3151.2) for the consumer increases in comparison to the final price (Rs.3120) paid by the customer in the first scenario. To maintain the same price (MRP) for the end customer, the firm has to take a hit on its margin so that the distributor and retailer margins are preserved. This happens because unlike VAT, CST cannot be claimed as “input tax credit”.
The above two scenarios clearly show that distributors will like to buy from a warehouse in the same state rather than buying directly from the firm in another state. This type of provision in the current tax structures has forced firms to locate warehouses in all the states where they do business.
Future State:
With the introduction of GST, the tax barriers on cross-border sales will be removed. The tax disincentive of cross-border sales due to the presence of CST will be eliminated.
Supply Chain Point | Landed Cost (in Rs.) | Margin (in Rs.) | Input VAT Credit (in Rs.) | Price Before Tax (in Rs.) | GST | Total Tax (GST) | Final Price (in Rs.) |
Firm | 1000 | 500 | 0 | 1500 | 4% | 60 | 1560 |
Warehouse | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 |
Distributor | 1530 | 500 | 0 | 2030 | 4% | 81.2 | 2111.2 |
Retailer | 2111.2 | 1000 | 81.2 | 3030 | 4% | 121.2 | 3151.2 |
The supply chain network can be made smarter so that the operational costs are minimized and efficiency is improved.
Currently, each of India’s 29 states taxes goods that move across their borders at different rates. As a result, freight that moves across the country is taxed multiple times. Worse, there are long delays at inter-state checkpoints, as state authorities review and examine freight and apply the relevant taxes and other levies.
Supply Chain Planning Decisions:
With GST regime, the supply chain network design would be purely based on logistics cost & customer service and provides a greater flexibility into Supply & Demand matching. This would lead to club many small warehouses and have bigger, fewer, and highly efficient warehouses. This also would reduce the share of unorganized sector in warehousing.
Further, the firms in the unorganized sectors, too, would be expected to improve their service levels if they intend to successfully grow in the likely shape up or shape-out competitive landscape.
India has one the highest logistics cost as a ratio of GDP compared to other countries of the world. Also transportation, inventory and warehousing contributes upto 70%of the total spend on logistics in India.
Country Logistics Cost Comparison:
Country | Logistics Cost/ GDP | Activities by 3PL/ logistics Activities |
India, China | 15-20% | <10% |
US | 9-10% | 60% |
Europe | 10% | 30-40% |
Japan | 11% | 80% |
The post-GST regime is, in fact, likely to offer many more unseen opportunities for unorganized entities to tie up or collaborate with established companies. This could ultimately result in a win-win scenario for both the collaborating parties and the industry at large.
In addition, GST also improves the transit and consequently delivery times because of state border crossing are likely to be simplified.
VAT has to be calculated on margin that we added, here VAT has been calculated on selling price
The profit margin shown in GST– Impact on Supply Chain Management is very high ? The margin shown may be for electrical product like wire and switches etc. When it comes to FMCG and daily essential product the profit margin rage from 5% to 10% In MRP
(Price structure at State Level) How Gov. collect VAT (Indirect Tax)
Company Price to C&F (A) Rs 76.18
C&F profit @ 2% Rs 1.52
C&F price to Distributor (B) Rs 77.70
VAT @ 12.50% Rs 9.71 1st Point Rs 9.71 (Gov. get this Rs 9.71 from C&F)
Distributor Price with VAT (C) Rs 87.41 (this is output VAT for C&F &
Distributor Profit @ 4% of (B) (D) Rs 3.11 Input VAT for Distributor)
Price to Shopkeeper (B)+(D) Rs 80.81 2nd Point Rs 10.10 (This is Output VAT for Distrib.&
VAT @ 12.5% Rs 10.10 Input VAT for Shopkeeper)
Price to Shopkeeper with VAT (E) Rs 90.91 (2nd-1st point) Rs 00.39 (VAT of Rs 0.39 paid by Distrib.)
Shopkeeper Profit @ 10% 0f (E) Rs 9.09 3rd Point
Price to Consumer (MRP) Rs 100.00 (VAT in MRP) Rs 11.11 (This is Output VAT for Shop)
(3rd-2nd Point) Rs 1.01 (VAT of Rs 1.01 paid by Shop)
So total VAT in Rs 100 MRP @ 12.5% is (1st +2nd +3rd ) i.e (Rs 9.71 + Rs 00.39 + Rs 1.01 = Rs 11.11)
VAT paid by (C&F + Distributor + Shopkeeper)