The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling in In re Amitkumar Maheshbhai Gulwani, examined whether a Goods Transport Agency (GTA) paying GST under the forward charge mechanism can claim input tax credit (ITC) on bio-diesel used in trucks for transporting goods.
Let’s be honest for a moment.
If you’re running a transport business, fuel is not a “supporting input”. Fuel is the business.
Without diesel or bio-diesel, the truck doesn’t move. If the truck doesn’t move, there is no freight. And if there is no freight, there is no GST supply at all.
Yet for years, GTAs have been asking one simple question:
“I’m paying GST properly under forward charge. Then why shouldn’t I get ITC on fuel?”
The Gujarat AAR has now answered this question in a refreshingly logical way in the case of Amitkumar Maheshbhai Gulwani (M/s Godavari Logistics) and the answer is YES, you can claim ITC on bio-diesel.
Let’s walk through this like we would explain it to a client, not like a court judgment.
What Exactly Was the Problem?
The applicant was a regular Goods Transport Agency, issuing consignment notes and paying GST under forward charge.
So far, no dispute.
Now comes the practical issue:
- He wanted to purchase bio-diesel
- Suppliers were charging 18% GST
- Bio-diesel was being used directly in trucks for transporting goods
Naturally, the question arose:
“Can I take ITC of GST paid on this fuel, or will the department say it’s blocked?”
That’s what was placed before the AAR.
First Things First Is He Really a GTA?
Yes. And this is important.
Under Section 2 of the CGST Act, a GTA is someone who:
- Transports goods by road, and
- Issues a consignment note
The applicant ticked both boxes. So the entire discussion proceeds on the footing that this is a genuine GTA, not a casual transporter.
GST Options for GTAs – Where People Usually Get Confused
Here’s where most misunderstandings begin.
Under Notification No. 11/2017–CT (Rate), a GTA has a choice:
Option 1: Reverse Charge (5%)
- GST is paid by the recipient
- No ITC allowed
- Fuel ITC automatically becomes irrelevant
Option 2: Forward Charge (12% / 18%)
- GTA pays GST itself
- Full ITC is allowed
- This includes ITC on inputs and input services

The applicant had formally opted for forward charge by filing Annexure-V. So legally, he was already in the “ITC allowed” bucket.
Now Let’s Come to the Heart of the Matter – Fuel ITC
Section 16 – The Basic Rule Everyone Forgets
Section 16(1) of the CGST Act is very clear:
If goods or services are used in the course or furtherance of business, ITC is available.
Ask yourself this honestly:
Can a GTA provide transportation service without fuel?
Of course not.
Fuel is not a luxury here. It’s not optional. It’s not personal use.
It is directly consumed to generate taxable outward supply.
That’s exactly what the AAR acknowledged.
But Isn’t Fuel ITC Blocked Under Section 17(5)?
This is where unnecessary fear creeps in.
Yes, Section 17(5) blocks ITC — but only for specific cases.
It blocks:
- Passenger vehicles
- Personal consumption
- Certain motor vehicle–related services
What it does NOT block:
- Fuel used in goods carriage vehicles
- Inputs used for taxable services unless specifically mentioned
The AAR clearly observed:
The restriction under Section 17(5) applies mainly to passenger vehicles, not to trucks used for transporting goods.
In simple words:
A goods carrier truck is not treated the same way as a car or passenger vehicle.
A Very Practical Way to Look at This
Let’s take a real-world example.
A transporter buys bio-diesel worth ₹5,00,000
GST paid: ₹90,000
If ITC is denied:
- That ₹90,000 becomes a dead cost
- Freight rates go up
- Ultimately, the tax burden passes to customers
GST was never designed to work like this.
The AAR rightly noted that when GST is paid on output services, the chain should not break in the middle unless the law clearly says so.
And in this case — the law doesn’t.
What the AAR Finally Held
The ruling was straightforward and sensible:
✔ The applicant can pay GST under forward charge
✔ He can opt for 12% (now 18%) with ITC
✔ ITC on bio-diesel fuel is allowed
✔ Section 16 permits it
✔ Section 17(5) does not prohibit it
Subject, of course, to normal conditions like:
- Proper invoice
- Receipt of goods
- GST actually paid to government
- Returns filed on time
(No special favors — just normal compliance.)
Why This Ruling Matters So Much
This ruling sends a strong message:
- Fuel is a business input for GTAs
- ITC provisions should be read practically, not suspiciously
- What is not blocked by law cannot be denied by interpretation
For transporters who have opted (or are planning to opt) for forward charge, this ruling brings real relief and clarity.
Final Thought
If a manufacturer can claim ITC on power used to run machines,
and if a service provider can claim ITC on rent and electricity,
then a transporter claiming ITC on fuel is not aggressive planning — it’s common sense.
This AAR simply puts that common sense back into GST.


