Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 56 Results

Investment by Financial Investor with protective rights for investments should not result in vesting of ‘Control’ of the Target Company with financial investor

Close business association between two or more persons does not by itself make them person acting in concert

Case Name : Triumph International Finance India Ltd. Vs SEBI (Securities Appellate Tribunal Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. 183 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :

Provisions of section 11B of SEBI Act can be applied retrospectively

Case Name : SEBI Vs Ajay Agarwal (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 1697 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1213)

Power of acquirer to nominate its one director on board of directors consisting of ten directors does not result in giving any effective control

Case Name : Subhkam Ventures (I) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. SEBI (Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. 8 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :

Section 4 of SCR Act, 1956 does not require publication of pre-recognition Rules and Bye-laws of a Stock

Case Name : Mahesh Ratilal Shah Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21686 of 2006
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (1213)

Writ petition can be dismissed even if the alternative remedy is available to the petitioner under SEBI Act, 1992

Case Name : N. Narayanam Vs SEBI (Madras High Court Madurai Branch)
Appeal Number : WP (MD) No. 6090 of 2009 and M. P (MD) No. 1 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/07/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (5560) Madras High Court (469)