Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Service Tax Penalty cannot be imposed u/s. 76 and 78 simultaneously

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Mittal Technopack (P.) Ltd. (CESTAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : Order No. A-531/KOL./2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Kolkata (370)

Circulars can’t impose an additional condition not provided in exemption notification for GTA Services

Case Name : Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad Vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (Gujarat High court)
Appeal Number : Tax Appeal No. 2172 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Gujarat High Court (1139)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Income from sale of abandoned cargo by a custodian of goods not liable to Service tax

Case Name : Maersk India (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. S/601/2012/WZB/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/03/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Water supply project not coverd under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services

Case Name : Lalit Constructions Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. S/387/2012/CSTB/C-I & A/184/2012/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/02/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Penalty cannot be presumed to be passed on to another person

Case Name : Shree Perfect Security Services (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/1073/WZB/AHD of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Service Tax – Penalty u/s. 76 and 78 cannot be levied simultaneously

Case Name : Jivant Enterprise Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/935/WZB/AHD OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Input credit of service tax can be taken only if the output is a service liable to service tax

Case Name : Venus Investments Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/47/WZB/AHD. OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/01/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Value of Purchased study material supplied to students not includible in the value of commercial coaching services

Case Name : Chate Coaching Classes (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Aurangabad (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order Nos. A/306-307 of 2012/WZB/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

Service tax on Charges for terminal handling, DOC & bill of lading services used for export are eligible for refund

Case Name : Akanksha Overseas Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Surat (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/1351-1358/WZB/AHD/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Pest control, sewage disposal, AMC of AC & computers are input services

Case Name : ADC India Communications Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 286 & 287 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031