Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 2226 Results

Agency Commission received by Banks / FIs from RBI / Govtschemes is exempt from service tax

Case Name : Union Bank of India Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Mumbai (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No.. ST/143 & 144 OF 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

BPO can take Input credit on CA, Business Support & Air Travel Service

Case Name : Sure Prep (I)(P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/347/2012/SMB/C-IV
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

SIM card distributor not liable to service tax if tax already been paid by Telecom Company

Case Name : G.R. Movers Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Lucknow (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Appeal Nos. ST/ 7, 198 & 1200 of 2011 & 540 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Input credit admissible on marketing services for marketing of assessee’s product outside India

Case Name : Syntel International (P.)Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/906/2012/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/12/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Mumbai (507)

In case of reverse charge mechanism service provider not liable to service tax

Case Name : Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad Vs Landmark Automobiles (P.)Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Order No.A/10137/WZB/AHD/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Cenvat Credit on input services prior to registration allowable

Case Name : Commissioner of Service Tax, Service Tax Division II, Chennai Vs Sylla Synergy India Ltd. (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 897 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Chennai (646)

Rajasthan HC – Circular authorizing recovery during pendency of stay application void if Assessee is not at fault

Case Name : Mangalam Cement Ltd. Vs Superintendent, Central Excise Kota (Rajasthan High Court)
Appeal Number : D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1624, 1847, 1891, 1899, 1900 to 1903, 2118 & 2138 of 2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/03/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13929) Rajasthan High Court (378)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Facilitating campus recruitment of students prima facie, amounts to provision of ‘Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency’ service

Case Name : Indian Institute of Management Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Bangalore (CESTAT Banhalore)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. 873 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/05/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Service Tax on Outdoor catering & transportation facility provided to employees eligible for input credit

Case Name : Paramount Communication Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, jaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No.ST/A/463/2012-CUS(PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/06/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Delhi (905)

Letter issued by Superintendent is not an appealable order

Case Name : Adani Petronet (Dahej) Port (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/261 OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/01/2013
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3904) CESTAT Ahmedabad (816)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031