Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1687 Results

No Penalty in case of interpretational nature – Supreme Court

Case Name : Uni flex Cables Ltd. Vs Commissioner, Central Excise (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Appeal (Civil) No. 5870 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Process of lifting water is incidental to manufacture ; Supreme Court decision prevails over Board Circular – SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur Vs Gurukripa Resins Private Limited (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 7627 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Excise Duty – Under Section 35C(2) CESTAT cannot altogether take a different view in law and it cannot reappreciate evidence

Case Name : Commissioner of Central excise Vs Rdc Concrete (India) P. Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 4409 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Honest mistake committed in maintenance of stock register can not be treated as fraud or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts – SC

Case Name : C.C.E., Mangalore Vs M/s. Pals Micro systems Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 6058 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Clandestine removal of excisable goods can not be denied by the company if MD of the company voluntarily came forward to sort out the issue and to pay the Excise duty – SC

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Kalvert Foods India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 4500- 4502 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Cost of packing of motor cycles cleared to Depot to be included in assessable value for Excise Duty Valuation – Supreme Court

Case Name : M/s. Royal En field (Unit of M/s. Eicher Ltd.) Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 4500- 4502 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)

Whether Iron and Steel structures manufactured and used captively in the factory for installation of the Sugar manufacturing plant by the assessee can be classified as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944?

Case Name : Saraswati Sugar Mills Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi- III  (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 5295 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

SC asks CBDT and CBEC to draft uniform policy on appeals in lost cases

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Vs M/s Doaba Steel Rolling Mills (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 3400 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2371)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

HC cannot decide on leviability of excise duty on a particular product if issue is already pending before Apex Court

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax Vs Jindal South West Steel Ltd. (Karnataka High Court)
Appeal Number : CEA NOs. 214, 215-218 OF 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/06/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13925) Karnataka High Court (634)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

The action of the Chief Commissioner to refuse to accept new units as a part of LTU and issuing show cause notice to them regarding transfer of Cenvat credit not tenable under LTU scheme

Case Name : Sharda Motor Industries Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition No. 9450/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/02/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13925) Bombay High Court (1879)

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031