Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 1695 Results

Manufacturing of goods under own brand name is not job-work

Case Name : Y.M. Krishna SSK Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Order No. A/775/2012/CSTB/C-I & S/1361/2012/CSTB/C-I
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/11/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Mumbai (510)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

No prescribed time-limit for taking Cenvat credit

Case Name : Central Bank of India Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 886 OF 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/08/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Chennai (649)

Cenvat Credit cannot be denied if invoice number was handwritten or rubber stamped

Case Name : Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : 2012-TIOL-787-CESTAT-MUM
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Mumbai (510)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Mere change in shareholding pattern not amounts to transfer of factory

Case Name : Auora Foam (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 377 OF 2011-EX(PB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 28/04/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

Demand based on verification of worksheet submitted by assessee is valid

Case Name : Malayalam Communications Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 474 & 475 OF 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Bangalore (304)

Place of removal in cases where duty is not payable on transaction value shall be place where duty is paid

Case Name : Lafarge India (P.) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Stay Order No. 1061 of 2012-EX (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

No payment required in cash where tax already deposited by utilizing CENVAT Credit

Case Name : Sangam India Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-II (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. 988-989 OF 2012-SM (BR)
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Delhi (916)

No need for one to one co-relation of CENVAT credit availed on input services towards payment of output services

Case Name : Jyoti Structures Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Nasik (CESTAT MUMBAI)
Appeal Number : 2012 (10) TMI 335
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Mumbai (510)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Payment out of Credit or PLA – Rule 8(3A) not applies to payments to be made under rule 6(3)(b)

Case Name : Air Control & Chemical Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order No. A/776/2011-WZB/AHD.
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/05/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All CESTAT (3928) CESTAT Ahmedabad (818)

If show cause notice suggests that Department had already come to conclusion it is to be set aside

Case Name : SBQ Steels Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 14380 Of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/10/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (14157) Andhra Pradesh HC (229)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031