NCLAT Delhi held that patent-related issues fall under the Patents Act, not the Competition Act, dismissing an appeal alleging anti-competitive conduct by Vifor International AG.
The NCLAT Delhi upheld the NCLT’s decision denying a suspended director access to discarded valuation reports of Winsome Yarns, clarifying that only CoC members are entitled to such documents.
The NCLAT dismissed Trinity Auto Components Ltd.’s appeal seeking enforcement of benefits under the BIFR scheme. The Tribunal held that the approved resolution plan under IBC replaced the earlier rehabilitation scheme, extinguishing all prior claims. It reiterated that no dual benefits can be claimed after IBC plan approval.
NCLAT Delhi held that initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by admitting application u/s. 7 justifiable since application duly filed within 3 years of ‘Promise to Pay’ under section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that mediation family settlement upheld since entire sum as per consent terms duly received. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi held that resolution plan of Dorni Vinimoy Pvt. Ltd. stands approved as material irregularity is not established. Accordingly, appeals are allowed and orders of adjudicating authority set aside.
NCLAT Chennai held that demand notice has been duly served on the personal guarantors and hence proceedings under section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 cannot be said to be vitiated. Accordingly, order quashed and proceedings remanded back.
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant doesn’t qualify as a Financial Creditor since appellant has failed to discharge the burden of proving any disbursement as defined under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, order upheld and appeal dismissed.
The NCLAT Delhi set aside the NCLT order admitting Athena Constructions Ltd. to CIRP, finding the Appellant was not heard on merits. While the financial creditor’s dues were settled, the NCLAT remanded the case to the NCLT to process the settlement plea and consider any claims received by the IRP.
The NCLAT Delhi dismissed an appeal by LBF Publications Private Limited, challenging an NCLT order that rejected its Section 9 IBC application. The dismissal was due to an undue and unexplained delay of 389 days in the refiling of the appeal after defects were notified by the Registry.
