The Jharkhand High Court has granted anticipatory bail to an accused in a GST fraud case, citing a completed investigation and lack of need for custodial interrogation.
GTL Infrastructure Limited Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) Based on the Jharkhand High Court’s judgment in the case of M/s. GTL Infrastructure Limited Versus The State of Jharkhand, the refund of a statutory pre-deposit is a vested right of the assessee and cannot be denied by invoking the limitation period under Section 54 […]
Jharkhand High Court dismissed the bail application since the twin condition as provided under Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 is not being fulfilled. Also, there is sufficient material collected by ED to show that the applicant is prima facie guilty of the alleged offences.
Jharkhand High Court held that order passed u/s. 74 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act no reasons whatsoever have been assigned for agreeing with the order passed by the Assessing Authority. Thus, absence of reasons is clearly suggestive of the order being arbitrary hence legally unsustainable.
Jharkhand High Court disposes of a petition challenging a GST scrutiny notice, directing the petitioner to file a reply within two weeks for consideration by authorities.
The Jharkhand High Court upheld a GST penalty for Pratik Enterprises, citing a discrepancy between the loading point in the E-Way bill and the actual location, supported by GPS data.
Jharkhand High Court held that nature of allegations of disproportionate assets beyond known source of income, corruption and various illegal action against Hon’ble Member of Parliament cannot be said to be Public Interest Litigation. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
Jharkhand High Court held that bail application stands dismissed since the material collected shows that the petitioner is prima facie guilty of an offence under Prevention of Money Laundering matter. Accordingly, bail application rejected.
The Jharkhand High Court has granted an interim stay on Goods and Services Tax (GST) proceedings against P. K. Agarwala, deeming a show cause notice (SCN) issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, as prima facie without jurisdiction.
The Jharkhand High Court has set aside a reassessment order against Anvari Khatun, citing the absence of a mandatory Section 148A notice. The case is remanded for fresh consideration with proper procedure.
