ITAT Kolkata held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as identity of loan creditor proved along with creditworthiness of the transaction.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition towards unexplained cash credit u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act untenable as cash deposited during the demonetization period duly explained.
ITAT Kolkata held that that law declared by a court will have retrospective effect, if not otherwise stated to be so specifically. It is also well settled proposition that whenever, a previous decision is overruled by a larger bench of the Supreme Court, the previous decision is completely wiped out.
ITAT Kolkata in the case of Cargo Handling Corporation Vs ITO examines disallowance made under section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act for non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. ITAT deletes the disallowance as the deductee has already paid tax on transportation charges.
A significant ITAT Kolkata ruling declares no penalty for delayed filing of books of account due to reasonable causes under Section 273B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Explore the details of this precedent-setting case.
The ITAT Kolkata has dismissed the appeal of Rohit Agarwal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-10, Kolkata. The appeal challenged the addition of Rs. 46,97,718/- as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal upheld the decision of the revenue authorities, stating that the transactions in question involved penny stocks and were held to be bogus by the Calcutta High Court.
Delve into the case of Santi Kumar Oswal Vs ACIT where ITAT Kolkata ruled that no disallowance can be made for GST paid before the due date of filing ROI, emphasizing fair application of the Income Tax Act.
Gain in-depth insights into the ITAT Kolkata’s landmark ruling on residential property deductions under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act. Learn how ownership of more than one house impacts tax deductions.
Read the analysis of the ITAT Kolkata order in the case of Asha Vijay Vs ITO regarding the inapplicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to transfers that took place before the accounting year 2014-15. Learn how the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
An in-depth analysis of the ITAT Kolkata case where an auditor’s error resulted in incorrect disallowance sum under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT has directed a re-adjudication of the case.
