Understand the value of tools and dies includable in the assessable value of excisable goods with the recent ruling on this case by CESTAT Ahmedabad.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that reversal of proportionate credit towards exempted goods along with interest already made, the demand of 10% /6%/5% of the value of exempted goods shall not be sustainable
Analysis of CESTAT Ahmedabad decision in Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd vs C.C.E. & S.T., focusing on retrospective effects of CBEC clarification on excise tax for Chlorinated Paraffin.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Cenvat Credit is admissible on any material used for construction of building or fabrication of any equipment which in turn used for providing output taxable service. Cenvat on material used in the manufacture of barges which are used for providing output service is admissible.
Read about the CESTAT Ahmedabad decision regarding service tax on fees paid to USFDA for approval of medicaments. The matter is remanded for further examination.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that during the charter period of vessels the right of possession of vessels and effective control have been transferred to service recipient, therefore the service does not fall under the “Supply of Tangible Goods Service”.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that providing transit mixers for transportation of Ready-Mix Concrete (RMC) is classifiable under ‘Goods Transport Agency’ (GTA) services and not under ‘supply of tangible goods for use service’.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that without advancing reasons for doubting or rejecting the load port test certificate, there was no real justification for resort to provisional assessment and drawing of samples. Accordingly, customs duty exemption granted.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that documentary evidence has far greater weightage against oral evidence especially when the oral evidence is contrary to the documentary evidence. Accordingly, duty demand unsustained as statutory records duly reflects receipts and consumption of goods.
A deep dive into CESTAT Ahmedabad verdict in Hitech Industries Vs C.S.T.-Service Tax. The tribunal clarified that job fabrication does not fall under the category of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Service, setting aside Service Tax demand.
