Relief to Videocon Industries, Interest of Refund allowable even if Refund was Granted after 3 Months from Date of Commissioner’s Order: CESTAT
Read the full text of the CESTAT Ahmedabad order in Gujarat Insecticides Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T. where no service tax was imposed on manufacturing through job-work.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that construction service provided under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) are exempted from the clutches of service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax set aside.
Learn about CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Cenvat credit for construction services in case of General Motors India. Analysis and implications explained.
Explore Bodal Chemicals Ltd vs. C.C.E. & S.T. case where CESTAT Ahmedabad remands matter pending a Supreme Court decision on Cenvat credit for exempted goods.
CESTAT Ahmedabad’s ruling on excise duty for physician samples sold to dealers for free distribution to doctors. Analysis of Sun Pharmaceuticals vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-ii case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the subsequent service of the order copy to the appellant is the date of communication of the order-in-original to the appellant.
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand on electrification services, ruling they do not qualify as works contract services. Read detailed case analysis.
In Lyka Labs Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T., CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments with non-active ingredients, setting legal precedence.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Sonic Chain Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Rajkot clarifies no penalty under Central Excise Rule 26 if no malafide intention. Analysis.
