Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Advance Rulings

Payments for referral services cannot be termed as fees for technical services (FTS)

July 9, 2010 2052 Views 0 comment Print

The receipts in the nature of referral fees do not constitute “fee for technical services”. Further, in the absence of a PE in India, the same cannot be subject to tax in India.

Ultimate Holding Company should not be considered as beneficial owner of gains arising to Subsidiary Company on sale of investments held by such Subsidiary Company

July 9, 2010 2263 Views 0 comment Print

The applicant, a Dutch company was incorporated on 11 August 2008. On 6 November 2008, it acquired all the shares of an existing Indian company from another group company located in Germany. The shares were acquired for a consideration of INR 100 million.

FII’s Income from trading in futures and options is business income

July 9, 2010 2961 Views 0 comment Print

FII‘s income from trading in futures and options is in the nature of business income. Special provisions under the domestic tax laws i.e. Section 1 15AD does not preclude FII‘s from earning business income in India.

Mere reimbursement of costs based on a cost sharing agreement not liable to withholding tax

July 8, 2010 6255 Views 0 comment Print

ABB Limited, an Indian company (ABB India) and ABB Research Limited, Zurich, a Swiss company (ABB Zurich) are part of the ABB group. The group is engaged in the manufacturing of power products and systems technologies and has business activities across the globe in over 100 countries.

Consortium members working together with independent scope not an AOP

July 8, 2010 2522 Views 0 comment Print

Merely coming together and acting in cooperation with each other for the purpose of executing the work while each member carries on its own scope of work independently does not reasonably lead to the conclusion that an AOP has been formed.

Supply of customized software and enabling client personnel to handle the system amounts to “fees for included services” under the India-US tax treaty

July 8, 2010 405 Views 0 comment Print

Under the specific facts of the case, customization of standardized software specific to client specifications was held to be “fees for included services” as the software developer made available technical knowledge, experience or skill to the client to enable client personnel to operate the software system themselves.

Payment received on account of supply of software products to independent third party re-sellers in India not royalties but business income

July 5, 2010 774 Views 0 comment Print

The applicant is a company incorporated in Japan and is engaged in the business of providing „Products Lifecycle Management? software solutions, applications and services. These software products are standardized and not customized or tailor-made. It markets its products in India through a distribution channel of third party resellers comprising Value Added Resellers („VAR?) who resells the software to end-users.

AAR ruling is binding on the revenue authorities despite any contrary ruling in other tax payer’s case

July 4, 2010 483 Views 0 comment Print

Prudential Assurance Company Ltd. (Prudential) is a foreign company incorporated in United Kingdom and is engaged in the business of Insurance. Prudential registered with the Securities and Exchange Board of India as a sub-account of a Foreign Institutional Investor (FII).

Payments from Indian Hotel Owner for Global Reservation Services is Business Income: AAR

May 24, 2010 1110 Views 0 comment Print

The payments received by the Applicant from the Indian hotel owner for provision of global reservation services (‘GRS’) would be chargeable to tax in India under section 9(1)(i) read with Articles 5 and 7 of the India-Luxembourg DTAA as business income and is attributable to the Applicant’s permanent establishment in India.

Taxability of Payment for assignment of contractual rights in connection with the supply of products to foreign company not having PE

May 22, 2010 7539 Views 0 comment Print

Recently, the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) in the case of Laird Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. [2010-TIOL-06-ARA-IT] has held that the fees received by the USA company for assigning contractual rights to the applicant for supply of products in India is taxable as business profits and in the absence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) such consideration is not taxable in India under the India-USA tax treaty (the tax treaty). Accordingly,

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031