In re Ansys Software Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) a) Whether Marketing & Pre-Sales Technical Support Services provided by the applicant will be classified as Intermediary services in terms of Section 2(13) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? The Marketing and Pre-sales Technical Support Services provided by the applicant will be classified […]
In re S.R.K Ladders (GST AAR Karnataka) What is the Classification of the goods manufactured by the dealer ‘Agriculture Tree Climbing Apparatus-Unipole Manually operated’- Principal raw material being Aluminium. In the instant case the goods in question “Agricultural Tree Climbing apparatus-Unipole Manually operated” is an agricultural implement and hence in common parlance it can be […]
The applicant is not eligible to avail input tax credit on the inward supplies of goods and services which are attributable to the incentives provided in the form of gifts of goods and services to the painters and dealers and other persons under the CGST / SGST / IGST Act.
In re Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Karnataka co-Coperative Milk Producers Federation Limited is liable to deduct GST TDS under section 51 of CGST Act on the payments made to suppliers? The issue before us to decide is whether the applicant falls under any of the categories of the persons […]
Applicant seeks clarification on the eligibility of input tax credit in respect of inputs, input services and capital goods received towards erection, installation and commissioning of the solar power plant.
In re Hical Technologies Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the value of free of cost supplied by principal not to be included in value of supply by job worker? The nature of supply done by the applicant is one composite supply consisting of two supplies – one relating to the manufacturing service on the […]
In re Banayan Tree Advisors (p) Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether they need to charge GST on the Portfolio Management Services provided to Non-resident client, where the client pays fee in foreign currency from their overseas account to the account of the Portfolio manager? It is clearly evident from the above that the place of […]
In re Morigeri Traders (GST AAR Karnataka) 1) Whether the applicant is required to be registered under the GST Act? If the answer to the above question is affirmative, then under which section the Commission Agents are to be registered? The applicant, being a commission agent, is required to be registered under Section 22(1) of […]
In re DLF Limited (GST AAR Haryana) Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the […]
The Applicant, however, vide their letter dated 04.09.2019 have requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling quoting the reason that the questions raised in their application were based on Place of Supply and also sale & shipment of the aircraft has already been completed.
